COLA/BEP UPDATE
Poll
ARE YOU WILLING TO SUPPORT OUR CLAIM FOR COLA/BEP REGARDLESS OF THE LEGAL FEE?
- [ 8 ]


[80%]
- [ 2 ]


[20%]

sonia duco brotarlo- Admin
- Number of posts: 62
Registration date: 2008-12-16
- Post n°1
COLA/BEP UPDATE
Batch 2 is with the Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 55, it was held in abeyance pending resolution of the 1st Batch. However, a hearing on April 22 was calendared to determine whether the case would proceed independently of the 1st Batch.
Batch 3 case for the restoration of 40% BEP is with the Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 34.
Based on the earlier decision of the RTC, Batch 1 is not a class suit since the petitioners were not the authorized representatives of all employees of LandBank. In the event that the case is won in court only the petitioners would be benefited.
LBPEA NEB on its meeting last February 13 came to a decision for the filing of intervention to represent the employees who were not petitioners in these cases subject to their approval through a special power of attorney.
However, the major issue and constraint lies on the legal fee of 30% which is not acceptable to majority. Actually, this is a contingent fee- we pay only if we win, if not we lose nothing.
While we are waiting and doing nothing to receive these benefits, there are lawyers who are working for us. As we all know, there are a number of Supreme Court decisions favoring payment of COLA.
LET THE LBPEA OFFICERS KNOW YOUR STAND, KINDLY CAST YOUR VOTE ON THE POLL AND YOU MAY WRITE YOUR COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS ON THE QUICK REPLY PORTION SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY. THANK YOU!





» STATEMENT OF CONDITION 12/31/08
» LIST OF UNITS WITHOUT RATIFICATION
» HMO UPDATE
» ALVIN D. ARRIZA-NEW CHAIRMAN OF THE HMO COMMITEE
» JULY 2009 ISSUE-LBPEA UPDATE FOR VISAYAS
» MARCH 2009 ISSUE
» POSITION PAPER CRAFTED DURING THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEETING
» GUIDELINES ON LBPEA HMO FUND ADMINISTRATION(SELF-INSURANCE)
» LBPEA NEB RESOLUTION TERMINATING MEDSERV CONTRACT